How to Contest a Chicago Driving While Using Mobile Telephone Without Hands-Free Device Ticket 9-76-230(a)

How to Contest a Chicago Driving While Using Mobile Telephone Without Hands-Free Device Ticket 9-76-230(a)
How to Contest a Chicago Driving While Using Mobile Telephone Without Hands-Free Device Ticket 9-76-230(a)

I was pulled over during my 5-block commute home from work the other day.  The officer asked me if I knew why she was pulling me over and had to honestly say that I didn’t.  She responded by telling me that I was using my cell phone while driving a motor vehicle.  I responded by telling her that I wasn’t using it–I didn’t have it up to my ear, I wasn’t texting, and I wasn’t even looking at it.  She replied by telling me that it didn’t matter because the phone was in my hand while I was driving and went back to her car to write up my ticket.

The officer took about 10 minutes to write me up and then came back to my car to inform me that she wasn’t going to take my driver’s license (why would they need to do that?!?!).  She informed me that I was being given a ticket for using a mobile device while operating a motor vehicle.  She went on to say that I had a court date if I wanted to contest and if I wanted to go to that court date I could pull my cell phone records to prove my case.  I was taken back by that last line because initially she had told me that it didn’t matter and now she was saying that it did matter.  I questioned her about that and she just said I could take up my case at my hearing.  I told her ok and then made my way home to relieve the baby sitter I was now 10 minutes late in relieving.

When I finally had some time to go over what just happened I read my ticket to learn that I was being charged with 1 count of:

Driving While Using Mobile Telephone Without Hands-Free Device 9-76-230(a).

The fine for that offense is $100…

Municipal Code Violations Eligible for Mail-In Payments and Fine Amounts

My options at this point are:

  1. Grin and bear it and pay the $100 within 7 days
  2. Show up to my court date here in 16 days and contest the ticket.

I’m going to contest it.

How to Contest a Chicago Driving While Using Mobile Telephone Without Hands-Free Device Ticket 9-76-230(a)

Preparing my case

This isn’t the only bogus ticket I’ve been given in my 11 years in Chicago but every other time it has just been left on my car while it was parked.  I get at least one absolutely bogus ticket a year– usually for not having a city sticker when I totally DO have one and the officer doesn’t even bother to get out of their vehicle to look, or for having expired plates when I totally DO have a brand new sticker on my plate like this spring when I got this ticket with an updated sticker on my plates:

Bogus expired plates ticket

All the previous tickets could be contested by mail using a letter and a picture like the one above that helped me beat the ticket.

The only thing the officer mentioned when talking about contesting the ticket was to pull my cell phone records so I was set on doing that.  My situation is a bit more complicated than normal because I use a Google Voice number on a Straight Talk SIM.  Many of my outgoing text messages go out as data via the Google Voice app I use, GV Connect.  The first thing I did was to try and pull my Straight Talk call records.

Getting your call and text records for your Straight Talk Phone

The first thing I did was to check if they are available via my Straight Talk user account.  I logged in and looked around and then searched and did not see call records anywhere.  I then called Straight Talk and was told that I needed to be transferred to a special line.  That line turned out to be a voicemail recording that told me a ton of detailed legal details of how to acquire my call records, almost to the depth of getting a search warrant but not quite.  It was way too much to remember and quickly I was totally overwhelmed with detailed information it was too late to write anything down.  I then started a support chat session with a Straight Talk representative and was given a pdf of the exact requirements.  You can download the file they emailed me here (on my dropbox).  The requirements are as follows:

  • The signed sworn statement requesting your Call Detail Records (attached) including the specific date range for the records you are requesting.
  • A legible copy of the back of the phone showing the IMEI/ESN/MEID number OR if you no longer have the phone, a Police Report indicating that your phone was stolen or a Police Incident report indicating that your phone was lost.
Straight Talk is really iPhone UNfriendly because they assume a lot in asking you to take a picture of the IMEI number on the back of the phone and also, in one place, mention taking your battery out to see the IMEI number–that’s not going to happen on an iPhone.  All those assumptions are that you purchased a straight talk phone and are not a “bring-your-own-phone customer.”My court date is in only 16 days so that run-around is not going to work.  I guess here’s where my cheap cell service comes back to bite me.  Luckily I use a google voice number so I can give VERY DETAILED phone records.
Click on History in the left column to see everything

Update June 16, 2014:  After going through all the run-around with Straight Talk and mailing them the request they ended up calling me saying that their form is wrong and all I need is the cell phone number (and not the IMEI number) and that I needed to re-fax in the form.  I did but it’s been over 2 weeks now and I still have not received any records from them.  I called them back today to inquire about it and when I called they said they’d need to transfer me to a different department and I was transferred to a message that just told me to do what I’ve already done… ugh.  I guess that’s what I get for saving money with Straight Talk.

Court Day Details

My court time was 9:00 AM but I didn’t want to mess with parking so I took the train.  The Brown/Purple line has a stop 3 blocks away from the court’s location at 400 W Superior St:

Brown/Purple Line Location in reference to the court

I got off the train around 7:45 in plenty of time to stop by Starbucks, which is close.  Here’s a map of all the important locations 🙂

Location of Starbucks in reference to the train stop and court

After grabbing a cold coffee beverage I went straight over to court to ask questions for this posting.  I walked over to the court building and this is what the entrance looks like:

400 W Superior City of Chicago Central Hearing Facility

I went on in at 8:05 AM and was greeted by a security officer who informed me that I couldn’t bring my drink in.  When I told him the type of ticket I had he told me that the hearing court doesn’t open up until 8:20 AM.  I went back outside and took note of the parking situation on the street.  There is pay by the hour parking on the street:

Street parking on West Superior Street

The current rates are as follows:  8AM-12AM Monday-Sunday, 4 hours max, $4/hour

Street Parking Rates outside the courthouse

At 8:05 there were plenty of open parking spots on the Wednesday I was there.

Entering the Courhouse

At 8:20 AM I went back into the court building and went through security.  You must run any bags and the contents of your pockets through an x-ray machine.  I wasn’t required to take off my shoes or belt, which set off the machine when I walked through.  The security officer had me step aside and used a wand on me and then let me go.  One thing to note is that you are allowed to bring in your cell phone and you can bring in a bag with a laptop.  You cannot bring in any pocket knives or any tool that might be used as a weapon, for example a screw driver.  After I got through security I was told that things didn’t open until 8:30 AM (which was different than I was first told).

Entering the Courtroom

There were about 10 seats available for people waiting to sit in and by the time I got comfortable there were at least 20 people there waiting.  At 8:27 AM everyone who had been sitting or standing and waiting formed a line in response to the movement of staff behind the temporary barrier in the hallway.  At 8:30 AM the security guard the security guard removed the temporary barrier and asked everyone to come in.  There was a kind of help desk in the hall there and the person began telling everyone that they could proceed directly to their court room if they had a copy of their ticket and it indicated a court room on it.  If you didn’t have a copy of your ticket there was a list on the wall that you needed to look through with court room numbers and names in alphabetically listed below and find your docket number and then get some paperwork to take in.  There were multiple lists for each court room number and each list was separately alphabetized.  Just for curiosity I looked down the lists for my name but didn’t ever see it.  I went ahead and then went to my room and was the first one in court room 101:

Court Room 101

It was extremely quiet in the courtroom with little noise coming in from the hallway.  Occasionally I’d hear the sound of an electric latch being unlocked down the hall off of the back of the courtroom.  It was loud enough to make you want to jump to attention and wondered if you’d hear someone say “all rise.”  No one ever said that though and never did the electric latch sound precede someone coming in.

The action starts

At 8:52 AM a lady in a pink sun dress came in and asked at least one man to take off their hat.  She sat in the center judges chair and logged into the computer and began to do some administrative things.  At this point someone’s phone in the audience rang and she responded by saying that that was a good reminder for people to turn their phones off.  It wasn’t long before another person’s phone rang out loud though.  The lady didn’t respond to the second call.  She was very friendly and joked with us about the hot weather.  She also put out a name plate that read: Julie Haran-King Administrative Law Judge.  Someone asked a question and as part of her answer she jokes, “I just work here.”

At a few minutes before 9 AM she started a digital counter on the desk and drew notice to it and said that this meant that they were now being video recorded.  At this point a couple people realized that they needed a copy of their ticket but didn’t have one.  Judge Julie indicated they needed to go back out and get a copy.

At 9:00 AM a lady came around and collected everyone’s ticket and left the room.  There were about 10 of us in the room by this time, a couple people were just accompanying the ticket holder.  Some people subsequently came in and there was some confusion since their tickets had not been picked up in the first batch.

The Judge Addresses the Small Crowd

Judge Julie then addressed us all and began to explain what was going to happen.  I couldn’t write it all down but here’s some things she mentioned:

  • The City attorney will speak to each person individually and ask what you want to do.
  • the City attorney does not represent you and cannot give you legal advise.
  • The City attorney will offer you a deal.
  • If you enter a plea first, you’ll be asked by the judge how you plea, you need to tell the judge what you told the attorney.
  • If you want to contest your ticket the City Attorney will look at the ticket and determine whether they feel they have enough proof to take it to a hearing.  “Preponderance of the evidence” is the deciding factor.
  • The police office DOES NOT need to appear.  The ticket is their sworn statement.  She also referred to some law passed by the city council that makes it that they don’t need to appear.  I don’t know if this is the case in traffic court or only for a non moving violation like the ticket I had.
  • After you have presented your evidence you cannot present anymore evidence.
  • “Liable” means you must pay the fine, which will be determined later by the judge.
  • “Mitigation” is where you can argue for a lower fine.
  • If you are found liable then you have 30 days to pay or set up a payment plan.
  • If you don’t pay it will be turned over to collections and there will be extra fines.
  • “Not liable” is when you are considered innocent and will owe nothing.
  • You may submit a “motion to set aside” to get a new court date for a legitimate reason (forgetting about it or not reading your ticket and missing your court date do not count as legitimate reasons).
  • “Timely” means 21 days.
The father of one kid who had a ticket had fallen asleep and Judge Julie asked his son to wake him up and reminded us all that this was not our living room.  We were told by the judge that we were allowed to leave the court room and put money in our meter or to stretch our legs.  She then reminded any newcomers that if they had not turned in their ticket at the back that they needed to do so.
At this point the City Attorney started calling people out a few at a time.  I overheard that one guy showed up on our date, June 18th, but his court date was actually July 18th, bummer for him.

My options

At 9:18 AM my name was called and I was asked to step into a side room off the back of the courtroom with about 5 other people.  They gave us back our tickets and gave us our options:

Plead Liable: i.e. admit you are guilty and pay a $90 fine and $20 in court fees.  You are getting the equivalent of a parking ticket, it doesn’t go on your driving record.

Amend Charge: You are taking a plea deal at a lesser charge and accepting 8 hours of community service plus $20 in court fees as your payment.  They hinted that the community service would be picking up trash at some location that they would indicated on a piece of paper they would give you later.  At some point they warned us that if we took the amended charge and didn’t show up for the community service then a warrant would be put out for our arrest.

Contest Charge: Here you are saying you are innocent and want to to a hearing.  If you contest you loose the options to plead liable or amend the charge and if you are found guilty then the judge has discretion to fine you up to $500.  You will go before the judge and make a case on how much you should have to pay if you are found guilty.

I was then asked what I wanted to do and I told them I wanted to contest the charge.  At 9:22 AM I was sent back to the main court room to wait to be individually called back in to talk to the City Attorneys.
As I waited in the courtroom the judge began calling people up and the first guy got his ticket dismissed for insufficient evidence presented by the City.
At 9:26 AM I was called back into the side room and the City Attorney told me she was going to “non suit”it because of lack of evidence.  She cited the lack of evidence in the narrative by the police officer on the ticket.  At this point I was sent back to the courtroom to be called up by the judge.
There were some hispanic people who had brought family members with them to translate for them from English to Spanish and the court was fine with that.
While I waited to be called the judge reminded us that those accepting community service needed to make sure to keep track of the piece of paper with their community service location, date, and time on it because it wouldn’t be written anywhere else.

It’s official–I’m innocent

At 9:36 AM I was called up and given the following piece of paper showing the city’s finding of “non-suit” and my penalty of $0.  I was very thankful.  I think justice was served except for the fact that the police officer should not have given me the ticket in the first place since I believe they knew it wouldn’t stand in court.
My “non-suit” (i.e. not guilty) paperwork, Penalties: $0.00
The whole deal seems to hinge on the police officer’s narrative, which in my case stated:

Subject observed holding a cellular device while driving a motor vehicle.

That is not enough evidence to prove that I was “using” my cell phone while driving, which I in fact was not.  So if that is the evidence against you and you don’t want to pay up the $100 fine I’d say contest it because you’ll get the charge dropped like in my case.  I didn’t even need to present any evidence.  Time to go back to work.

Other useful links:

Amazon Associate Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This means if you click on an affiliate link and purchase the item, I will receive an affiliate commission. The price of the item is the same whether it is an affiliate link or not. Regardless, I only recommend products or services I believe will add value to Share Your Repair readers. By using the affiliate links, you are helping support Share Your Repair, and I genuinely appreciate your support.

Written By
More from John Mueller
Replace Recessed Flood Bulbs With LED Bulbs-Review of Feit Electric BR30 LED Flood Bulb
Hardware: Feit Electric BR30 13Watt LED flood bulb Philips 65W BR30 indoor...
Read More

11 Comments

  • Hi John, my description read "Above subject observed violating above (non-legible)" assuming "above code or statute". The cop was nice about it but pulled me over similarly to Tarlib's case – I had my earpiece on and my phone was lit but I wasn't on it and the phone was just in my lap. I have phone records to prove that no phone calls / text messages took place literally 10 minutes before after the time recorded on the ticket.
    So what do you think my chances are? I definitely want to contest because it's not fair! I really wasn't using my phone why should I have to pay! Convinced this is a play for the city of Chicago to make an extra buck to help with the enormous city/state deficit we are facing!!! grrrr

    • I think your chances are good. Bring your phone records with you. It was easy for me to beat the ticket and I didn't even need to talk to the judge–the prosecuting attorney looked at the ticket and dropped it.

    • Hi John! my ticket got dismissed – I didn't even have to present any evidence! They didn't even ask me anything! They're really hoping for people to not waste their time on going and just paying the ticket off. Ugh, it was such a waste of 40 minutes – but I'm glad I didn't have to fork up $100. Thank you for your advice!

    • Thanks for checking back in and letting me know how it turned out for you and so others can learn from it as well. Yes, it seems that the police either do not know the law themselves or they are just harassing people by making them go through showing up to court (or pay the fine because they don't want to or can't get off work to go to court).

    • Great question. As I shared above I know that if you Plead "Liable," i.e. admit you are guilty you must pay a $90 fine and $20 in court fees. If you contest the charge, and then lose, the judge has discretion to fine you up to $500 and I'm guessing you'll owe some court fees too, at least $20 for sure. I don't have a clue how the judge makes their determination on the fine. The reason I contested my case was because I was not guilty and was willing to roll the dice a bit because I was not willing to admit guilt when I wasn't.

  • John I will be fighting my ticket tomorrow so I will let you know how I fair. I was undoubtedly not using my cell phone but I had just gotten off of a call and my phone was on my lap(left thigh to be exact). I was using a headset, but when I moved the phone from my lap to the passenger seat, the officer must have seen the light of the phone(it was dark empty street) and decided I was on the phone. When he approached the car he immediately saw that my headset was in ear and I told him I wasn't on the phone but even if I was I had my headset on. He said that even if I was holding it I was in violation. Even though I felt he was misinterpreting the law, we had a few good laughs and I decided to fight the violation. My phone log shows there was a 3-5 minute difference from when he stopped me to when my last call ended. This should help some based on my testimony, but I refuse to be harassed into a guilty plea just to save a buck. We'll see tomorrow. Thanks for posting.

    • Thanks for sharing. Please let me know in the comments how your fair (and the details you feel free sharing). It really comes down to how the officer described what you were doing on the ticket. They don't show up to the hearing–the judge solely goes by what was written on the ticket, which, in my case, was "observed holding a cellular device while driving a motor vehicle." When the City's attorney saw that they didn't even bother the judge and dismissed it. What did the officer write to describe what you were doing on your ticket?

    • Did you find this posting because you are trying to fight a ticket you received? If so, please share the details and how you faired when you went to court. Thanks, John

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *